Home Classified Calendar Letters to the Editor Contact Us  
Search    
 
   
Committee recommends Pennell as new town hall
Voters have the final say, but a town panel recommends renovating the historic building for municipal use

By Jennifer Boenig

The Gray Community Economic Development Committee has presented their recommendations to the town council regarding a plan to construct a new town office complex.

Last Thursday, committee members hammered out the final details of their report which they presented to council members during this week’s council workshop.

“Several months ago, the council requested that the CEDC develop cost estimates for several alternatives related to the relocation of our currently overcrowded town office,” said Jeanne Carpentier, chairwoman of the Community Economic Development Committee. “The charge was then fine-tuned to two items: The first was to determine the costs to construct a new town hall and to not consider the cost of the land in this scenario. The second was to determine the best method to renovate, alter and/or add on to Pennell.”

The committee members ended up examining four possible scenarios: moving the town offices to the 1954 section of the historic Pennell Institute building, constructing a new town office complex on an unknown lot, building a new 4,500 square foot assemblage building or renovating the 1876 portion of Pennell Institute.

Don Hutchings, a member of the Community Economic Development Committee, told councilors that Ron Norton of NBBR, N.G. Bailey and OEST Associates provided estimates at no cost to the town. Estimates given for renovating the 1954 section of Pennell were $1,374,200 and to renovate the inside and outside of the 1876 section of Pennell Institute was approximately $678,000. If a new town office was built on an undetermined lot, the estimate was

 


 

$2,129,493 and the cost to construction a separate 4,500 square foot assemblage facility is $966,227.

“We’ve engaged three very well-qualified people and they’ve come back with very hard numbers and these numbers, like the old saying goes is, we’re pretty sure you can go to the bank with these,” said Hutchings. The final recommendations from the committee to councilors were to utilize and renovate the old and new sections of the Pennell complex for the town office. Committee members felt there was enough space available at Pennell to forgo building a new assemblage facility. They also recommended the Gray Historical Society stay at Pennell Institute and to have town councilors enter into a dialogue with the historical society and Pennell alumni association to develop a financial arrangement for the use of the facility.

“We strongly recommend that the town office relocation be coupled with
a commitment to sell the existing town office complex of the old post office, the existing town office and Stimson Hall and utilize the funding from the sale to defer the cost of the renovation work at Pennell,” said Carpentier.

All council members thanked the Community Economic Development Committee for their hard work and for providing such a detailed report. The councilors then discussed the best way to write out the various options as a referendum question for November’s ballot. Town Manager Deborah Cabana explained to councilors that with a binding referendum, the winning option must receive 50 percent plus one majority vote.“I think what the council has to decide is: are there two questions or are there three?” said Peter Gellerson, chairman of the town council.

 
Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine) is shown around the Pennell Institute by Gray Historical Society President Louise Knapp. Collins said she is willing to help look for federal funding for the restoration of the old school building. Dan Gelinas photo

“I can easily see new (complex) versus Pennell as being potentially the only two questions with none of the above.”

Councilors carried on a lengthy discussion about how many and whatquestions to pose on the ballot. Councilors Tracy Scheckel and Mark Grover discussed presenting the idea of the new town office being built where the current town office is without taking Stimson Hall into account.

“I’m personally a little uncomfortable putting a $2 million dollar question on the ballot without a piece of property to build it on even in our heads, let alone ask the public,” said Scheckel. Councilor Matt Sturgis said the people have indicated they want the town office complex at Pennell and the committee’s recommendation supports Pennell as well. “We need

 

to deal with Pennell. We need to figure out what we’re going to do with it and if we’re going to move the town office over there, then that’s what we do,”said Councilor Margaret Hutchins. “If we start adding this whole complex, we’re getting away from the whole Pennell issue and that’s not what we should be doing.”

Chairman Gellerson asked councilors to each craft a ballot question and they could continue their debate at next week’s council meeting

scheduled for Sept. 2. Members of the Community Economic Development Committee are also planning on attending the council meeting to answer any questions the public may have regarding their report.

Gray residents will vote to approve a plan for the town hall in November on national Election Day.

   
 

Copyright © 2008 Independent Publishing - All Rights Reserved
Web Site by
Paul Baumann Web Design Studio